Arizona Court of Appeals decision clarified when and how a party must request attorneys’ fees on appeal

McKeddie Cooley was recently published in an Arizona Court of Appeals special action decision that clarified when and how a party must request attorneys’ fees on appeal. The case, Halt v. Hon J. Richard Gama, clarified the requirements of Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 21. In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals vacated a homeowners’ association’s judgment that contained an award of over one hundred thousand dollars in attorneys’ fees and costs against homeowners. The full decision is as follows:     Read the decision………..


Related Articles

Construction-defects reform: Colorado House Speaker lays out changes she will back

Colorado House Speaker Crisanta Duran would support legislation requiring more homeowners to approve a construction-defects lawsuit and providing more information

Court Affirmed Dismissal Of Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Condo Board Members

In Brown v. Hensley, a condominium complex was damaged by a hurricane, and the board of the complex allowed the

Death of Democratic construction-defects bill refocuses effort on comprehensive reform (CO)

A Colorado Senate committee on Monday killed a construction-defects reform bill described by its author as a compromise measure to