Arizona Court of Appeals decision clarified when and how a party must request attorneys’ fees on appeal

McKeddie Cooley was recently published in an Arizona Court of Appeals special action decision that clarified when and how a party must request attorneys’ fees on appeal. The case, Halt v. Hon J. Richard Gama, clarified the requirements of Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 21. In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals vacated a homeowners’ association’s judgment that contained an award of over one hundred thousand dollars in attorneys’ fees and costs against homeowners. The full decision is as follows:     Read the decision………..


Related Articles

Amendments to Pennsylvania’s Uniform Condominium Act and Uniform Planned Communities Act

Recently, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett signed into law House Bill 1122 (the “Amendment”), which amends the Uniform Condominium Act and

Common Sense Prevails: State of Collapse Nonexistent Thirteen Years before Discovery of Decay

The Homeowners Association of the Queen Anne Park Condominium in Seattle discovered decay within the walls of its buildings in 2011

Counsel’s Corner: HOA Super-Priority Lien Issue Not as Clear After Court Opinion

In a nutshell, what clarity did the most recent opinion by the Nevada Supreme Court provide for the pending litigation around HOA super priority liens?