California Court Considers Reimbursement of Legal Fees Under D&O Policy
In its recent decision in Clark v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of America, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114877 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2015), the United States District Court for the Central District of California had occasion to consider when an insurer’s duty to reimburse defense costs under a D&O policy is triggered. Read the article………….
Fee Clause Interpretation/Homeowner Associations: HOA Not Entitled To Fee Recovery For Fiduciary Duty Victory Because Administration Of CC&Rs Fees Clause Doesn’t Cover Fiduciary Breach Claims
In Hoofman v. Pacific Crest Community Assn., Case No. B230036 (2d Dist., Div. 1 Apr. 16, 2013) (unpublished), an HOA
A judge has ruled that Effingham Green Condominium associations are responsible for repairs of faulty balconies identified a year ago,
Dog bites man, man sues board. Are you adequately insured? “My dog doesn’t bite.” Don’t believe those four innocent words.