Ninth Circuit: Excess Insurers Must Tread Carefully When Rejecting Demands Exceeding Primary Limits (CA)

Under California law, a liability insurer has a good faith duty to reasonably settle claims within its policy limits. In Diamond Heights Homeowners Association v. National American Insurance Co., the California Court of Appeal held that where a proposed settlement demand exceeds a defending primary insurer’s limits and has been approved by the insured and the primary insurer, an excess insurer has three options: (1) approve the proposed settlement; (2) reject it and assume the insured’s defense; or (3) reject it and face a potential lawsuit from the insured. 227 Cal.App.3d 563, 580-581 (1991). The rationale for this rule is that the excess insurer cannot force the primary insurer to continue defending a case that should resolve within the excess insurer’s limits.      Read the article………….


Related Articles

Recovering Attorneys’ Fees in HOA Election Disputes

The California Court of Appeal’s recent ruling in a case underscores how crucial it is for HOAs to strictly comply

New Florida Bill Seeks to Bring Regulations to HOAs that Have Previously Only Applied to Condo Associations

Community association attorneys are often asked about the lack of uniformity in the Florida laws and regulations for condominium associations

HR3700-affected condo rules in 90-day comment period

New rules on condominiums affected by HR3700 (The Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act of 2016) that must make them eligible