Ninth Circuit: Excess Insurers Must Tread Carefully When Rejecting Demands Exceeding Primary Limits (CA)

Under California law, a liability insurer has a good faith duty to reasonably settle claims within its policy limits. In Diamond Heights Homeowners Association v. National American Insurance Co., the California Court of Appeal held that where a proposed settlement demand exceeds a defending primary insurer’s limits and has been approved by the insured and the primary insurer, an excess insurer has three options: (1) approve the proposed settlement; (2) reject it and assume the insured’s defense; or (3) reject it and face a potential lawsuit from the insured. 227 Cal.App.3d 563, 580-581 (1991). The rationale for this rule is that the excess insurer cannot force the primary insurer to continue defending a case that should resolve within the excess insurer’s limits.      Read the article………….


Related Articles

Update on Flag Legislation (OH)

On June 10, 2015, the House of Representatives unanimously approved House Bill 18 regarding the display of service flags in

The HOA was Sued and we Should Tender – What Does That Mean?

It is not uncommon for a condo association or HOA to become embroiled in some sort of dispute or litigation

Rules of new neighborhood, community critical to know

When moving into a new home, there’s an extensive list of things you need to know: How to control the