Ninth Circuit: Excess Insurers Must Tread Carefully When Rejecting Demands Exceeding Primary Limits (CA)

Under California law, a liability insurer has a good faith duty to reasonably settle claims within its policy limits. In Diamond Heights Homeowners Association v. National American Insurance Co., the California Court of Appeal held that where a proposed settlement demand exceeds a defending primary insurer’s limits and has been approved by the insured and the primary insurer, an excess insurer has three options: (1) approve the proposed settlement; (2) reject it and assume the insured’s defense; or (3) reject it and face a potential lawsuit from the insured. 227 Cal.App.3d 563, 580-581 (1991). The rationale for this rule is that the excess insurer cannot force the primary insurer to continue defending a case that should resolve within the excess insurer’s limits.      Read the article………….


Related Articles

Understanding Legal Liability for Condominium Association and Unit Owners

Legal liability is liability imposed by the courts or by statute on any person or entity responsible for the financial

Parking spot battle costs others thousands, gets B.C. couple kicked from condo

What started as a parking spot dispute devolved into such heavy legal gridlock that a judge has ordered a B.C.

Learning from Palm II (IL): Key Considerations for Holding Meetings

As boards and managers begin to evaluate their meeting procedures in light of the Palm II case, we would like