Ninth Circuit: Excess Insurers Must Tread Carefully When Rejecting Demands Exceeding Primary Limits (CA)

Under California law, a liability insurer has a good faith duty to reasonably settle claims within its policy limits. In Diamond Heights Homeowners Association v. National American Insurance Co., the California Court of Appeal held that where a proposed settlement demand exceeds a defending primary insurer’s limits and has been approved by the insured and the primary insurer, an excess insurer has three options: (1) approve the proposed settlement; (2) reject it and assume the insured’s defense; or (3) reject it and face a potential lawsuit from the insured. 227 Cal.App.3d 563, 580-581 (1991). The rationale for this rule is that the excess insurer cannot force the primary insurer to continue defending a case that should resolve within the excess insurer’s limits.      Read the article………….


Related Articles

Legislative developments (IL) abound that affect condo associations

There have been quite a few Illinois legislative, judicial and executive developments affecting condominium associations recently. Part one is below,

Illinois Supreme Court Limits Scope of Snow and Ice Removal Immunity

Illinois law provides that any owner, lessor, occupant or other person in charge of residential property who “removes or attempts

Push to revise HOA rules statewide underway (FL)

Channel 9 has reported on a battle among HOA members in Poinciana that grew heated and ended up in front