Oregon High Court Clarifies How To Read the Four Corners of a Complaint

On December 8, 2016, the Oregon Supreme Court issued a decision, West Hills Development Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc., 360 Or. 650 (2016), clarifying what allegations in a construction defect suit will implicate coverage under an “ongoing operations” additional insured endorsement. In West Hills, the complaint at issue regarded damages suffered by the plaintiff HOA, which were necessarily experienced after completion of the named insured subcontractor’s work. Specifically, the HOA complained that defects in the subject townhomes led to damage from water intrusion.     Read the article………………


Related Articles

Successor Property Owner Win In Homeowner Assessment Foreclosure Battle Did Not Entitle Owner To Fees (CA)

In Multani v. APB Properties, Case Nos. B260610/B265172 (2d Dist., Div. 7 June 13, 2016) (unpublished), plaintiff HOA were embroiled

Implications of a homeowner association’s statutory priming lien (CO)

While representing an institutional lender in the making of a loan secured by real property located in Colorado, we came

AB 1720 Defeated (CA)

On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee heard two bills of utmost importance to CAI-CLAC