Oregon High Court Clarifies How To Read the Four Corners of a Complaint

On December 8, 2016, the Oregon Supreme Court issued a decision, West Hills Development Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc., 360 Or. 650 (2016), clarifying what allegations in a construction defect suit will implicate coverage under an “ongoing operations” additional insured endorsement. In West Hills, the complaint at issue regarded damages suffered by the plaintiff HOA, which were necessarily experienced after completion of the named insured subcontractor’s work. Specifically, the HOA complained that defects in the subject townhomes led to damage from water intrusion.     Read the article………………


Related Articles

Stormwater Rules Get Another Facelift

While some changes to the stormwater rules are innocuous, the overall scope of changes will have a large impact on development activities.

Strata law changes will have a big impact on the residential market in 2014 (Australia)

As we start to reflect upon 2013 and the last six months in particular, there are signs that 2014 will

New Law Requires Clearing of Snow from Fire Hydrants within 24 Hours (NJ)

which gives municipalities the authority to require adjacent property owners to clear snow from all fire hydrants “within 24 hours of snow coverage.”