Oregon High Court Clarifies How To Read the Four Corners of a Complaint

On December 8, 2016, the Oregon Supreme Court issued a decision, West Hills Development Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc., 360 Or. 650 (2016), clarifying what allegations in a construction defect suit will implicate coverage under an “ongoing operations” additional insured endorsement. In West Hills, the complaint at issue regarded damages suffered by the plaintiff HOA, which were necessarily experienced after completion of the named insured subcontractor’s work. Specifically, the HOA complained that defects in the subject townhomes led to damage from water intrusion.     Read the article………………


Related Articles

Ham Radio Antennas – Congress Still Can’t Decide What To Do

During the 2015-2016 federal legislative season, the Ham Radio lobby introduced H.R. 1301, a bill which sought to prohibit associations

Homeowners associations fighting back in Virginia legislature

Virginia’s legislature is poised to pass a bill that would allow homeowners associations to charge fines not laid out in

Do New Laws Provide Unintended Consequences?

The recent session of the Florida legislature produced a series of new laws affecting community associations in Florida. However, often