Condo Directors Must Be Willing to Compromise and Find Solutions

You may recall our blog on the Ballingall decision, released in April. This case dealt with the enforcement of a single-family provision in a condo declaration. In its decision on costs, released this morning, the Superior Court of Justice reminds condo directors that they must be willing to compromise and work with all owners who have legitimate interests. Failure to do so can be expensive for corporations, for condo directors personally… and for owners.   Read the article………


Related Articles

Successful Owner in Condo Oppression Case Denied Costs

In a prior blog post, we reviewed the case of Couture v. TSCC No. 2187, where the Court found that

Condo Board Meetings in Mandarin Prompts Human Rights Complaint

A group of condominium unit owners in Richmond, B. C. have filed a complaint with the British Columbia Human Rights

The challenge of condo design upgrades ever-growing

In a prior column on ‘The Southampton’, a condominium located in the west end of Toronto, I indicated that it