Condominiums and Conflicts of Interest: How to interpret the rebuttable presumption (FL)

The legislature recently amended Chapter 718 of the Florida Statues, relating to condominiums, to create a rebuttable presumption that a conflict of interest exist in certain situations.[1] A conflict of interest is a real or seeming incompatibility between one’s private interests and one’s public or fiduciary duties. Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014). For example, if a board member owns a landscaping company that provides services to an association, the board member’s private interest in obtaining a profit may be incompatible with the board member’s fiduciary obligation to choose a landscaping company that will provide the best service at the lowest price. If there is a rebuttable presumption of a conflict of interest, a court would start with the presumption that the relationship creates a conflict and the contracting entity or the officer or director would need to prove that the relationship does not, in fact, create a conflict of interest. If there is no rebuttable presumption, an officer or director may still have a conflict of interest, but the party challenging the contract or seeking to remove the board member would need to prove that a conflict exists.     Read the article………………

Related Articles

General Assembly Passes Three Important Condo Bills In Connecticut

The Legislature passed three condominium-related bills during its 2013 Regular Session that ended at midnight on June 5th (PA 13-156,

Appellate Ruling Illustrates Importance of Proper Service of Process and Procedural Steps in Foreclosure Cases (FL)

Associations have been counseled for the last several years to move quickly to foreclose on units in cases of prolonged lender foreclosures

Hobby Lobby’s “passing strange” interpretation of RLUIPA: an unlikely, but potentially dramatic, impact on land use law?

Receiving almost no coverage—scratch that, absolutely no coverage—in yesterday’s Hobby Lobby decision was that an important part of the case