Third Circuit: neighbors who criticized condo residents over emotional support dogs must face civil rights suit

In blog posts and comments, two residents of a Virgin Islands condominium complex criticized two other residents who were (in line with rights prescribed to them under federal law) keeping emotional-support dogs despite a no-dog rule in the complex. Among other statements, one or the other of the two said dog owners would be “happier in another community,” speculated that “diploma mill” paperwork could certify any canine whose owner cared to claim stress, suggested the complex should “lawyer up” and be prepared to go to court to defend its rule against “known violators,” and proposed the dog owners be “ostracized” by other residents.   Read the article……………


Related Articles

Michigan Court of Appeals rules mortgagees responsible for condominium assessments from date of sheriff’s sale

In Wells Fargo Bank v. Country Place Condominium Association, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed an issue of first impression

To What Extent Should Condominium Corporations Indemnify a Director Who Has Been Ordered to Pay Costs? (ON)

For those following the case opposing a Durham condominium corporation to its former director Leslie Swan, the Court of Appeal

Colorado Federal Court Applies Builder’s Risk Exclusion and Policy Endorsement to Preclude Coverage for Underlying Construction Defect Litigation

Even where insureds clear the “property damage” and “occurrence” hurdles to finding coverage for construction defect claims under liability insurance