Trio of Recent Decisions on the I v. I Exclusion Should Remind Policyholders to Annually Review the Language in Their Policy to Avoid Losing Coverage

D&O policies vary quite a bit from carrier to carrier, and language on “standard” exclusions can change from year to year. Accordingly, it is important to do a yearly review of your D&O policy to make sure your company has the right coverage. Three recent federal court decisions interpreting the “insured vs. insured” or “I v. I” exclusion remind us why examining specific policy language and understanding how it may apply to your business is so important.   Read the article………


Related Articles

House passes Corvese bill meant to resolve condo disputes (RI)

The House of Representatives last week approved legislation sponsored by state Rep. Arthur Corvese to create a less costly process for resolving minor disputes involving condominium associations and owners.

The use of fringe science in Washington state collapses for policyholder allegations of collapse

The Washington Court of Appeals recently addressed what evidence an insured can present to prove that its buildings reached a

Legislative Alert (WA)

The 2017 Washington State legislative session commenced on January 7, 2017 and is in full swing. It’s expected to be