Trio of Recent Decisions on the I v. I Exclusion Should Remind Policyholders to Annually Review the Language in Their Policy to Avoid Losing Coverage

D&O policies vary quite a bit from carrier to carrier, and language on “standard” exclusions can change from year to year. Accordingly, it is important to do a yearly review of your D&O policy to make sure your company has the right coverage. Three recent federal court decisions interpreting the “insured vs. insured” or “I v. I” exclusion remind us why examining specific policy language and understanding how it may apply to your business is so important.   Read the article………


Related Articles

Nevada Legislature: Swing voting GOP assemblyman reassigned to new committee

A Nevada assemblyman who broke rank with fellow Republicans on a key bill opposed by unions has moved from a

Community Associations and the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment to the United States’ Constitution guarantees individuals the right to keep and bear arms. The Florida constitution

Strata Reforms Could Change the Face of Urban Western Australia

Long-awaited reforms to strata laws in Western Australia promise to have a dramatic impact upon the state’s urban landscapes by