Trio of Recent Decisions on the I v. I Exclusion Should Remind Policyholders to Annually Review the Language in Their Policy to Avoid Losing Coverage

D&O policies vary quite a bit from carrier to carrier, and language on “standard” exclusions can change from year to year. Accordingly, it is important to do a yearly review of your D&O policy to make sure your company has the right coverage. Three recent federal court decisions interpreting the “insured vs. insured” or “I v. I” exclusion remind us why examining specific policy language and understanding how it may apply to your business is so important.   Read the article………


Related Articles

Nevada HOA foreclosures cannot extinguish deeds of trust held by Fannie Mae, holds U.S. district court

Yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada issued an important ruling concerning the litigation over whether homeowners’

HUD Reverse Mortgages for Co-ops Unlikely

A long-awaited regulatory change that would open up the federal government’s reverse mortgage program to co-ops is unlikely to happen,

Assessment Collections in the Wake of the Huntington Case (CA)

Collecting assessments has never been an easy job. There are pitfalls lurking around every corner and innumerable requirements waiting to