Did the State of Michigan inversely condemn the entire City of Flint?: Environmental justice meets the Takings Clause

A complaint filed in mid-January by plaintiffs in Michigan’s Court of Claims alleges a novel, and intriguing claim. Taken to its limits, the class action essentially alleges that the State of Michigan inversely condemned the entire City of Flint, or some large portion thereof, by knowingly transferring the city to a water source contaminated with lead.  At first, the action may seem far-fetched. But is it? This story from the New York Times seems to indicate that everyone who can get out of Flint is doing just that. The only people staying are those too poor to leave.      Read the article………….


Tags assigned to this article:
FlintMichigantakings

Related Articles

To all pond owners & HOA leadership: ‘Please let us fish’ (TX)

Last summer I discovered a hot spot, a honey hole, a bastion of bass and bream. Every plug I tossed,

Other victims of the recession (ID)

The recession hit hard in America as well as here in North Idaho. Not only were families affected by job

Florida Supreme Court Ruling on Attorneys is Bad News for Condo Associations

Condo association boards hoping to cut legal fees by performing some everyday tasks in-house will need to reconsider after the