Did the State of Michigan inversely condemn the entire City of Flint?: Environmental justice meets the Takings Clause

A complaint filed in mid-January by plaintiffs in Michigan’s Court of Claims alleges a novel, and intriguing claim. Taken to its limits, the class action essentially alleges that the State of Michigan inversely condemned the entire City of Flint, or some large portion thereof, by knowingly transferring the city to a water source contaminated with lead.  At first, the action may seem far-fetched. But is it? This story from the New York Times seems to indicate that everyone who can get out of Flint is doing just that. The only people staying are those too poor to leave.      Read the article………….


Tags assigned to this article:
FlintMichigantakings

Related Articles

Securing Co-owner Compliance: The Remedies Available to a Condominium Association

The Michigan Court of Appeals has noted that, by purchasing a unit in a condominium project, “each unit owner must

How the Trayvon Martin tragedy affects you, your community

With the George Zimmerman trial dominating the news and calling attention once again to the tragic shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon

Maintenance and Repair Issues: “So What If You Don’t Fix It Right Now?”

As we know, a condominium association has many duties and obligations to fulfill, including the collection of assessments, and the