Did the State of Michigan inversely condemn the entire City of Flint?: Environmental justice meets the Takings Clause

A complaint filed in mid-January by plaintiffs in Michigan’s Court of Claims alleges a novel, and intriguing claim. Taken to its limits, the class action essentially alleges that the State of Michigan inversely condemned the entire City of Flint, or some large portion thereof, by knowingly transferring the city to a water source contaminated with lead.  At first, the action may seem far-fetched. But is it? This story from the New York Times seems to indicate that everyone who can get out of Flint is doing just that. The only people staying are those too poor to leave.      Read the article………….


Tags assigned to this article:
FlintMichigantakings

Related Articles

Towering inferno of excuses

Despite warnings that the city wouldn’t extend the deadline further, 455 high-rises failed to complete the fire safety improvements by

EDITORIAL: Political signs display constitutional rights

The state mid-level appeals court that decided last week in favor of Queensbury homeowners who put political signs in front

Co-owners Cannot Withhold Assessments in a Dispute with the Condominium Association

Quite often, when a co-owner becomes dissatisfied with the maintenance or services provided by the Condominium Association, he or she may