Quid Pro Quo and Hostile Environment Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices Under the Fair Housing Act

This final rule amends HUD’s fair housing regulations to formalize standards for use in investigations and adjudications involving allegations of harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability. The rule specifies how HUD will evaluate complaints of quid pro quo (“this for that”) harassment and hostile environment harassment under the Fair Housing Act. It will also provide for uniform treatment of Fair Housing Act claims raising allegations of quid pro quo and hostile environment harassment in judicial and administrative forums. This rule defines “quid pro quo” and “hostile environment harassment,” as prohibited under the Fair Housing Act, and provides illustrations of discriminatory housing practices that constitute such harassment. In addition, this rule clarifies the operation of traditional principles of direct and vicarious liability in the Fair Housing Act context.        Read the new rule…………….


Related Articles

New Idaho HOA Decision From Supreme Court

Although Idaho courts rely on principles of contract construction to interpret covenants, conditions, and restrictions, there are a few instances

Legislators still struggling over construction defects reform (CO)

The old adage goes, “If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”  As the state’s construction

FHA Condo Rules are Outdated and Burdensome, Say 69 Members of Congress

In a letter sent last week to Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, 69 members of Congress