Quid Pro Quo and Hostile Environment Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices Under the Fair Housing Act

This final rule amends HUD’s fair housing regulations to formalize standards for use in investigations and adjudications involving allegations of harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability. The rule specifies how HUD will evaluate complaints of quid pro quo (“this for that”) harassment and hostile environment harassment under the Fair Housing Act. It will also provide for uniform treatment of Fair Housing Act claims raising allegations of quid pro quo and hostile environment harassment in judicial and administrative forums. This rule defines “quid pro quo” and “hostile environment harassment,” as prohibited under the Fair Housing Act, and provides illustrations of discriminatory housing practices that constitute such harassment. In addition, this rule clarifies the operation of traditional principles of direct and vicarious liability in the Fair Housing Act context.        Read the new rule…………….


Related Articles

Illinois Supreme Court Agrees to Decide Breadth of Condo Developer’s Tort Duties

In the closing days of its November term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to review a decision from Division 5

Exclusive Common Areas – New legislation taking effect on Jan.1, 2017 (CA)

An “exclusive use common area” is defined as a common area that an owner has the exclusive right to use.

Free Speech In Condos And Co-Ops: Round III Goes To The Resident (NJ)

It is not quite Ali-Frazier or even Gatti-Ward, but the New Jersey Supreme Court just delivered its third opinion in