Sierra Crest Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Villalobos (TX)

This was an action to enforce restrictive covenants in a residential subdivision. Appellees built a retaining wall on a lot they owned within the Sierra Crest Subdivision. Alleging that the wall was built without approval, was defective, and posted a safety risk, appellant sued for declaratory and injunctive relief. The case proceeded to a jury trial, and the jury found appellees did indeed violate the covenants, but it also found the appellants acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and discriminatorily, and was not irreparably and imminently harmed by the breach.     Read the article…………


Related Articles

FL: Just released 3rd DCA opinion could harm your already struggling association

A case decided today could mean financial hardship for already struggling Florida associations. The Third District Court of Appeal’s ruling

MN Court: No expectation of privacy in condo buildings

If a police officer enters your secured condominium building without a warrant and a drug-sniffing dog outside your door detects

Dispute Over Landscaping Repairs Results in Personal Penalties against Condo Directors and a Fascinating Governance War Story

Court decisions holding corporate directors personally liable for acting in bad faith tend to be few and far between in