Sierra Crest Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Villalobos (TX)

This was an action to enforce restrictive covenants in a residential subdivision. Appellees built a retaining wall on a lot they owned within the Sierra Crest Subdivision. Alleging that the wall was built without approval, was defective, and posted a safety risk, appellant sued for declaratory and injunctive relief. The case proceeded to a jury trial, and the jury found appellees did indeed violate the covenants, but it also found the appellants acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and discriminatorily, and was not irreparably and imminently harmed by the breach.     Read the article…………


Related Articles

Nevada court decisions on HOA foreclosure crisis muddy the waters

Since September 2014, the lending industry has been scrambling to understand and reconcile the Nevada Supreme Court decision in SFR

Reading the Nevada Tea Leaves after Shadow Wood

In the wake of SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., in which the Nevada Supreme Court held

Proposed Transfer Fee Bill Rewritten to Require Transparency

While folks were understandably concerned about an onerous transfer fee bill proposed by Representative Jeanne Labuda (D-Denver), and some even