Judicial Follies: Companion fish
Some years ago, the California Supreme Court decided a case involving a woman who was forced to give up her two house cats to comply with rules adopted by her condominium association that prohibited pet ownership. Not all pet ownership, however; the association’s rules allowed “birds and domestic fish.” But not cats. This gave a dissenting justice the opportunity to sing the praises and joys of cat ownership, and to lament that his colleagues were wrong in not protecting the woman’s pets. Read the article………….
Those who suspect that the brains of homeowner’s association board members have been surgically removed and placed in jars must
Many San Antonio Hills residents want to change their homeowners association’s sphere of influence (SOI) from Los Altos to Los
What does it mean to own property? Are app-based lodging and transportation services showing the way toward an enlightened age