Judicial Follies: Companion fish

Some years ago, the California Supreme Court decided a case involving a woman who was forced to give up her two house cats to comply with rules adopted by her condominium association that prohibited pet ownership. Not all pet ownership, however; the association’s rules allowed “birds and domestic fish.” But not cats. This gave a dissenting justice the opportunity to sing the praises and joys of cat ownership, and to lament that his colleagues were wrong in not protecting the woman’s pets.    Read the article………….


Related Articles

HOA HOMEFRONT: Reader questions on insurance coverage

Is it required that an HOA purchase earthquake insurance? Does it have to be stated in the CC&R’s? Can the

Integrity on the Front Porch and the Polar Ice Caps (SC)

On Wednesday, January 16 at 9:30 am in the Charleston County Courthouse two years of expensive and massively disruptive litigation

Condo-owners ask for short-term rental revision (CA)

After hearing complaints from a group of about a dozen condominium owners, City Council has decided to revisit the short-term