From a misplaced mat to a $170k lawsuit – the danger of breaching duties of care (Australia)

Damages of $171,500 plus costs have been awarded against a Mosman owners corporation for a breach of its duty of care to a resident who tripped on a frayed floor mat Left in a lift for more than a day after somebody had moved in.  The owners corporation’s duty of care owed to the resident was held to be a duty including the known potential risk of damage and injury caused by removalists using the building’s lift. The performance of this duty included ensuring compliance with the building’s code of conduct for moving, checking the adequacy of the mat used to protect the lift floor and ensuring it was safe for residents to go to and from their apartments while removals were occurring.  Read the article…………….


Related Articles

HOA Super Priority Legal Battles Continue in the Silver State: What Senate Bill 306 Means for Nevada HOAs, Lenders and Homeowners

In 1991, the Nevada Legislature enacted the Uniform Common-Interest Ownership Act (UCIOA) which had been promulgated by the National Conference

California Appeals Court Upholds Reasonable Election Rules

According to the Court of Appeal in San Diego County, a homeowners association may adopt, by rule, a Board candidate

Public Policy Encourages Mediation but Court Decision Says Developers Can Require It

Most community associations and their attorneys would probably agree that mediation can be a desirable alternative to litigation for resolving