New appellate case causes uncertainty about accepting partial payments (FL)

Before 2008, association attorneys were understandably concerned about accepting partial payments with a restrictive endorsement (where the owner wrote “payment in full” on the check.) Doing so might bar associations from demanding full payment, where the partial payment was not, in fact, payment in full. This is called “accord and satisfaction.”     Read more……..


Related Articles

Website raises legal questions about homeowners and tenants hosting travelers

Orsi says the problem is that lawmakers did not foresee the complications that arise in a shared economy model, nor

Burlingame lawsuit likely headed to trial

Burlingame homeowners are preparing to take a construction defect lawsuit to trial, after the parties failed to come to terms

Appellate Court Rules In Favor Of Association To Recover Unpaid Assessments From Third-Party Purchaser (IL)

To the benefit of Associations who are hit hard by the foreclosure crisis, the First District Appellate Court recently held