NSW: Supreme Court Finds Certifier Liable for Building Defects

In 2014, the High Court decided in the Brookfield case that a builder responsible for defects in the construction of a serviced apartment building in Chatswood did not owe the owners corporation of the building a duty of care to avoid economic loss, essentially because the builder and developer entered into a detailed building contract which limited the builder’s liability for defects and the owners could have taken steps to protect themselves from financial harm caused by the builder’s negligence: see Brookfield Multiplex Ltd -v- Owners – Strata Plan 61288 [2014] HCA 36.     Read the article…………..


Related Articles

California Court of Appeal Opens the Door for Construction Defect Claims Outside of SB800

On August 28, the California Court of Appeal ruled that SB800 (Civil Code sections 895 through 945.5, the “Right to

CA: Hoffman et al v. Pacific Crest Community Association

Sarah and Glenn Hoofman appeal summary judgment in favor of respondent and cross-appellant Pacific Crest Community Association (PCCA). The Hoofmans commenced a

Condo Association May Violate Consumer Protection Acts

Although they differ in form and substance, many States have enacted Consumer Protection Laws. Their purpose, in the words of