NSW: Supreme Court Finds Certifier Liable for Building Defects

In 2014, the High Court decided in the Brookfield case that a builder responsible for defects in the construction of a serviced apartment building in Chatswood did not owe the owners corporation of the building a duty of care to avoid economic loss, essentially because the builder and developer entered into a detailed building contract which limited the builder’s liability for defects and the owners could have taken steps to protect themselves from financial harm caused by the builder’s negligence: see Brookfield Multiplex Ltd -v- Owners – Strata Plan 61288 [2014] HCA 36.     Read the article…………..


Related Articles

Removing unwanted bikes from unit blocks is breaking strata law – for now (Australia)

It’s a quirk in strata law that’s about to be fixed, bringing it into line with tenancy laws. Under the

Class Analysis Not Needed in Construction-Defect Case

The Nevada Supreme Court has ruled it neither arbitrary nor capricious for a trial judge to decline to perform a

Lender liability for Florida HOA and condominium association assessments 2014 update

While Florida continues to make progress processing and completing the backlog of residential foreclosures stemming from the prior decade’s housing