NSW: Supreme Court Finds Certifier Liable for Building Defects

In 2014, the High Court decided in the Brookfield case that a builder responsible for defects in the construction of a serviced apartment building in Chatswood did not owe the owners corporation of the building a duty of care to avoid economic loss, essentially because the builder and developer entered into a detailed building contract which limited the builder’s liability for defects and the owners could have taken steps to protect themselves from financial harm caused by the builder’s negligence: see Brookfield Multiplex Ltd -v- Owners – Strata Plan 61288 [2014] HCA 36.     Read the article…………..


Related Articles

The Law Governing The Running of Implied Warranties On Common Elements Depends On Whether a Maryland Condominium Was Created Prior To Or After October 1, 2010

During 2010 legislative session, then Maryland General Assembly enacted an amendment to Section 10-131 of the Maryland Condominium Act governing

California Supreme Court To Review Unpublished Tract 19051 HOA v. Kemp Decision

Issue Is Whether Prevailing Homeowner Entitled To Civil Code Section 1354 Fees When HOA Found Not To Be A CID. Read

Amalgamation of separate corporate entities

In the recent Magnolia North POA v. Heritage Communities, Inc., the Property Owners Association (POA) sued Heritage Communities, Inc. (HCI),