The Shakespeare Case and What it Means to Utah HOA’s

On June 22, 2016 the Utah Supreme Court published the Fort Pierce Industrial Park Phases II, III & IV Owners Association v. Shakespeare case, 2016 UT 28. This case established a bright line rule that the Court rejected strict construction of restrictive covenants in favor of applying the rules of construction typically found in contracts.  While many practitioners of community association law felt that this was already in the law in Utah, there was some confusion due to dicta in St. Benedict’s Development Co. v. St. Benedict’s Hospital, that “restrictive covenants are not favored in the law and are strictly construed in favor of the free and unrestricted use of property.”    Read the article……………


Related Articles

HOA Can’t Prohibit Water-efficiency Measures (CA)

In California, a Homeowner Association (HOA) cannot prohibit individual owners from replacing their existing landscaping with low-water-using plants. That limitation

San Francisco condo owners can sue architects

A state appeals court has reinstated a lawsuit by a San Francisco condominium owners’ association against architects of a 595-unit

SF 2312 Condos and Co-ops Bill (IA)

The bill clarifies that the terms, conditions, covenants, and provisions of the documents creating and regulating a multiple housing cooperative