Some Possible Implications Arising From California Supreme Court’s Pinnacle Decision

/ Owner - August 20, 2012

On August 16, 2012, our state supreme court issued its opinion in Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development, Case No. S186149 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Aug.16, 2012). The high court found that CC&Rs mandating arbitration between developers and homeowner associations (HOAs) were enforceable under the Davis-Stirling Act and were not unconscionable in nature. There are at least two possible implications arising from Pinnacle that have importance in the attorney’s fees area.  Read More……

Comments are closed.