Twin Creeks v. Sunset Ridge, 03-16-00653-CV (TexApp Dist 08/25/2017)

In this case of first impression, appellee sued appellant seeking a declaration that an amended restrictive covenant filed by appellant that required club membership was invalid as to condominium owners under the Uniform Condominium Act §82.0675(a) due to appellant’s failure to renew the covenant after the ninth anniversary. On motion, the trial court granted appellee summary judgment holding that §82.0675 applied to the amended restrictive covenant, that the restrictive covenant was not renewed after the ninth anniversary of the date it was filed, and that any provision of the restrictive covenant requiring condominium owners to maintain club members was invalid.    Read the article……………..


Related Articles

Diarrhea Signs (And Others) Now Required for California Condo and HOA Pools

Have you heard the latest regarding new required pool signage at California community association pools? Our attorneys have been receiving

Volunteer Labor in your HOA: Worth the Risk?

Sometimes, Boards will have the idea to rely on volunteer labor from community members for cleanup or maintenance projects as a way to save some money in the budget

California Assembly OKs bill barring HOA bans on fake grass

California homeowner associations couldn’t stop members from installing fake grass on lawns under a bill moving through the Legislature.  AB349