No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Sanchez v. Cobblestone Homeowners Ass’n (NC)

In the case of Sanchez v. Cobblestone Homeowners Ass’n of Clayton, Inc. 2016WL4598554 (September 6, 2016), the defendant Cobblestone HOA (HOA) informed plaintiff that her property was not included in the HOA declaration. Accordingly, she was not required to pay association fees and she was not entitled to use of the amenities owned by the HOA, such as a pool and tennis courts. The HOA offered to incorporate plaintiff’s property into the declaration so she could continue to pay dues and have access to the HOA amenities.   Read the article……………


Related Articles

Court Decisions May Make it Harder for Condominium Associations to Restrict Free Speech Rights of Owners

In condominiums as in society generally, laws and legal theories change over time as technologies, economies and stoical structures evolve.

Court (CA) Clarifies Transfer Disclosure Law for Mixed-Use Property

The recent appellate decision of Richman v. Hartley is critical for California real estate agents and sellers to know as

Nevada District Judge Voids HOA Foreclosure Following Evidence that HOA Hindered Bank’s Efforts to Preserve its Mortgage

Bank of America presented evidence that it had paid any HOA dues that could potentially have priority over the first mortgage