Short-Term Rentals Not a Violation of Rules Against Business, Non-Residential Uses

In the case of Santa Monica Beach Property Owners Association v. David Acord, the association appealed a lower court’s order dismissing its action against the homeowners who rented their homes on a short-term basis. The association’s argument in both the lower court and the appellate court was that such short-term rentals constituted a violation of the community’s occupancy restrictions, which required that the homes be used for residential, non-business uses. Specifically, the association’s argument hinged on the community’s occupancy restrictions, which provided that the plots “shall be used only for residential purposes … nor shall any building on said land be used as a hospital, tenement house, sanitarium, charitable institution, or for business or manufacturing purposes nor as a dance hall or other place of public assemblage.”     Read the article………….


Related Articles

Mastering California’s Anti-SLAPP Law

Since California’s anti-SLAPP statute is the oldest, it’s also one of the most widely used, showing up in everything from

What Proposed Changes to Ohio’s Flag Laws Mean for Condominium Associations

A recently-proposed bill in the Ohio Senate – S. B. No. 84 – seeks to amend certain portions of the

Community & Homeowner Association Q&A: Hurricane Preparation Part II

Question: Many of our owners are away for the summer, but have furniture and plants on their balconies. Can the