A recent Eleventh Circuit decision on the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) caught my eye. It involves the kind of question legislators (and their staffs) probably never think about when drafting a statute. Law professors dream up these types of questions when trying to find a way to puzzle their students on an exam. It’s of interest only to nerds of the law. In Ruhlen v. Holiday Haven Homeowners, Inc., No. 21-90022, — F.4th –, 2022 WL 701622 (11th Cir. Mar. 9, 2022), the question was whether the trial court’s order remanding the case to state court “sua sponte” — Latin for “of its own volition” — could be appealed. Read the entire article……………………………….
Chicken enthusiasts in Missouri may have something to crow about soon. Many Missourians have sought…
A strata (condo) unit owner in British Columbia has been ordered to pay their strata…
Community associations are founded on principles of shared responsibility and collective maintenance. From maintaining common…
“It’s a lack of clarity that creates chaos and frustration. Those emotions are poison to…
The Virginia General Assembly approved a number of bills during its 2024 legislative session. Some…
After the Trustees of his condominium refused his request for an Architectural Variance to install…