……I imagine this may have been similar to what the defendant in Marano v. The Hills Highlands Master Association, Inc. said when it received an unfavorable arbitration award. “Did you say binding arbitration? No. We were participating in non-binding mediation. Not arbitration.” Things worked out for Vincent Gambini in the movie, they did not work out so well for defendant in Marano. In Marano, plaintiffs owned a unit in a condominium development. The relationship between unit owners, like plaintiffs, and the association was governed by the association’s bylaws, which “arguably include[d] an arbitration provision.” So, after a dispute developed between plaintiffs and the condominium association over a “flooding condition” in their backyard, plaintiffs’ attorney wrote to the association’s attorney to demand arbitration. Read the article……………
The Board of Directors of Waterford Master Residential Association has announced that the Community Association…
A Burnaby condo owner has won a victory over his strata after it accused him…
For condominium owners or buyers in Florida, it was a one-two punch, a vicious combination…
Serving on the board of a homeowner association is a high calling. Well meaning volunteers…
The state water board in charge of Lake Tahoe broke California laws and its own…
Racially restrictive deeds and exclusionary covenants are still scattered across the Kansas City metro, embedded…