This case is a collision between dogs as emotional support animals and a “no dogs” condominium association rule. The civil rights implications of a “no pets” rule are pretty obvious; such a rule can exclude the disabled. At the same time, we know that emotional support animals can be overclaimed, and we also know that the tiniest of disputes in condo/homeowners’ associations can easily mushroom into the Apocalypse. Read the article…………
Owners at the Regency Gardens Condominiums got notices saying their board plans to pass a…
The aftermath from the multi-day barricade in Henderson remains. The face of the townhome where…
The Arizona Court of Appeals on Tuesday rejected a lawsuit filed by debt collectors and…
Buckley says the condo association was developed with private infrastructure and the maintenance of roadways…
The Netstrata insurance scandal rocked the strata management industry in NSW but that’s just the…
"We started the energy modernization of the house back in 19. At that time, we…