The recent unpublished opinion of Chemers v. Quail Hill Community Association et al. (2018) shines some light on the oft-misunderstood California Anti-SLAPP statute and its effectiveness as a defense for actions by a homeowners association’s board of directors. The Fourth District California Court of Appeal held that certain actions by the board in a dispute with a director were not in furtherance of the right of free speech or petition as to be protected by the anti-SLAPP statute. Read the article…………………..
Residents in a quiet Cadence community in Henderson want answers after a 37-hour-long barricade situation…
For board members of homeowners and condo associations in Florida, addressing disaster preparedness and safety/security…
When you live in a community managed by a Homeowners Association (HOA), you understand your…
We recommend that pool rules be adopted and mailed or emailed to all Owners and…
The clock is ticking for Florida condominium owners who now have to come up with…
A wildfire swept through the Hawaiian town of Lahaina in August, last year, causing an…