In Estate of Romig by Kooman v Boulder Bluff Condominiums Units 73-123, 125-146, Inc, No. 347653, issued October 15, 2020 (Docket Nos. 347653 & 348254), the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that a condominium association’s alleged denial of a request to install a railing to accommodate a disabled person did not constitute discrimination in a “real estate transaction” under the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Acts, (PWDCRA), MCL 37.1101 et seq. Specifically, in a published opinion, the Court held that the PWDCRA only applies to pre-sale disability discrimination and that the remedy for post-sale disability discrimination must be based on the Michigan Condominium Act, specifically, MCL 559.147(a)(1). Read the article…………………………………
Chicken enthusiasts in Missouri may have something to crow about soon. Many Missourians have sought…
A strata (condo) unit owner in British Columbia has been ordered to pay their strata…
Community associations are founded on principles of shared responsibility and collective maintenance. From maintaining common…
“It’s a lack of clarity that creates chaos and frustration. Those emotions are poison to…
The Virginia General Assembly approved a number of bills during its 2024 legislative session. Some…
After the Trustees of his condominium refused his request for an Architectural Variance to install…