In blog posts and comments, two residents of a Virgin Islands condominium complex criticized two other residents who were (in line with rights prescribed to them under federal law) keeping emotional-support dogs despite a no-dog rule in the complex. Among other statements, one or the other of the two said dog owners would be “happier in another community,” speculated that “diploma mill” paperwork could certify any canine whose owner cared to claim stress, suggested the complex should “lawyer up” and be prepared to go to court to defend its rule against “known violators,” and proposed the dog owners be “ostracized” by other residents. Read the article……………
The ultimate test of a binding settlement agreement is whether the parties to the agreement…
All too often attorneys only tell others about the cases they win. This column is…
The High Court of Sabah and Sarawak here on Tuesday settled a lawsuit claim over…
Enumerate, the leading provider of community association management software and payments solutions, is excited to…
It meant that, continuing Thursday and on into this week, contested issues regarding the north…
In an effort to reverse what some Palmetto Bluff residents see as an overreach by…