The New Jersey Appellate Division’s recent decision in Matejek v. Watson was notable in two respects. First, it provides a private party an order compelling another party to participate in an environmental investigation without proving liability, something not previously allowed under New Jersey’s Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act) or its federal counterpart, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Cleanup and Liability Act (CERCLA). From a plaintiff’s perspective, this gives the Spill Act a significant advantage over CERCLA and could spawn an increase in Spill Act litigation. Second, the decision introduced condominium owners to the wonderful world of environmental liability under the Spill Act. Read the article…………….
Before we look at the data, I can speak about my local experience in Southwest…
Condominium residents of the Courtyards at Waipouli Apartments on Kaua?i are concerned that they will…
Kelly, If the board decides to change any rules shouldn’t those rule changes be placed…
Q: What are the requirements regarding electronic Board meeting notices as governed by "Florida Administrative…
Residents in one Orlando condominium complex are fighting back after their condo association board asked…
The law addresses a gap in the state’s condominium insurance requirements, previously marked by vague…