The New Jersey Appellate Division’s recent decision in Matejek v. Watson was notable in two respects. First, it provides a private party an order compelling another party to participate in an environmental investigation without proving liability, something not previously allowed under New Jersey’s Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act) or its federal counterpart, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Cleanup and Liability Act (CERCLA). From a plaintiff’s perspective, this gives the Spill Act a significant advantage over CERCLA and could spawn an increase in Spill Act litigation. Second, the decision introduced condominium owners to the wonderful world of environmental liability under the Spill Act. Read the article…………….
HOA nightmares are one of the most frequent calls into the Channel 2 Action News…
Homeowners in the Eucalyptus Hill Improvement Association (EHIA) have brought in a herd of goats…
As Floridians, the dance of hurricane prep is an annual occurrence. From June to November,…
Embarking on a major refurbishment project for a condominium is an exciting endeavor, promising revitalized…
In the realm of condominium maintenance and improvement, decisions regarding windows and exterior aesthetics are…
If the association is still doing things the old fashioned way and making deposits by…