On June 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided Texas Dep’t of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, __ US __ (2015), a decision that affects community associations throughout the country, including in Michigan. In a surprise to many court observers, the Supreme Court endorsed the disparate impact theory of liability under the federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., (the “Act”), as opposed to the stricter standard of disparate treatment. Under a disparate impact theory, a plaintiff does not have to prove discriminatory intent. This is in contrast to a disparate treatment theory of liability, under which liability depends on whether a protected trait “actually motivated” the decision being challenged. Read the article………..
If the association is still doing things the old fashioned way and making deposits by…
Q: My condominium association board assessed seven thousand dollars per unit right after the Hurricane…
Dianne Post didn't believe it until she saw it, right there in the deed to…
CINC Systems, the leading provider of software solutions for the community association management (CAM) industry,…
How does the Ahwatukee Board of Management spell diversion, set-up and please let us ignore…
The president of a Sarasota homeowners' association is calling foul on a church's youth baseball…