In February, the Court of Appeals of Kentucky ruled that using a property for a short-term rental didn’t classify as residential use and violated a restriction limiting the property’s use to a private summer residence. The homeowners in the case (The Hoffman Revocable Trust v. Marshall) purchased a home in a community association, which had restrictions, reservations, and covenants on how the property could and could not be used, including that the property “shall be used only for the purpose of constructing and using a private summer residence or for other private recreation purposes; provided, the occupancy of a residence for private residential purposes at times other than the summer season would not be deemed a breach of the occupancy restriction.” Read the article……………………………
Owners at the Regency Gardens Condominiums got notices saying their board plans to pass a…
The aftermath from the multi-day barricade in Henderson remains. The face of the townhome where…
The Arizona Court of Appeals on Tuesday rejected a lawsuit filed by debt collectors and…
Buckley says the condo association was developed with private infrastructure and the maintenance of roadways…
The Netstrata insurance scandal rocked the strata management industry in NSW but that’s just the…
"We started the energy modernization of the house back in 19. At that time, we…