In Charles E Phyle Restated Revocable Trust v Scheppe Investments, et. al., unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 22, 2021 (Docket No. 353045), the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the successor developer of a RV condominium improperly charged the co-owners for fees related to recreational facilities that the developer owned on an adjoining property. The decision is important as it is the first case that interpreted the requirements set forth in MCL 559.234 of the Michigan Condominium Act, and accompanying administrative rule, Mich Admin R 559.111, that must be complied with in order to charge fees to use recreational facilities that are located outside of a condominium. Read the entire article……………………………….
HB 5109 was introduced by the Michigan Legislature in 2023 to provide more flexibility for…
A Berthoud man was sentenced last month in Weld County after taking more than a…
The advantages offered by solar energy systems, in the midst of a scenario in which…
Navigating the complexities of a community association often demands astute questioning to steer strategic initiatives…
In a homeowner association (HOA), the board of directors has a long list of responsibilities,…
WCNC Charlotte got this email from Florentina R.: "Our HOA board has refused to conduct…