The summer of 2017 saw a number of severe storms in the Midwest, with resulting insurance claims. As policyholders have made those claims, some have been surprised to see new provisions in their insurance contracts. Things are not always black and white in insurance policies, especially when it comes to the impact of a Minnesota court decision that required insurers providing replacement cost coverage to reasonably match replacement siding. Since the Minnesota Supreme Court issued its opinion in Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium Association, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, insurers have begun inserting language in their policies that expressly precludes the coverage requirement of matching based upon color, a change in product specifications, or other factors, in an attempt to circumvent this clear precedent. Read the article……………..
More and more people these days are living in common-interest ownership communities. These are residential…
The measure providing for the redevelopment of condominiums in the country has been unanimously approved…
After the Trustees of his condominium refused his request for an Architectural Variance to install…
David Langston is the President of Beaver Creek Homeowners Association and one of his many…
A March ruling by Florida’s First District Court of Appeal and the 2016 incident behind…
Officials said that Slothower devised a scheme to misappropriate more than $1 million from clients…