Insurance Carriers Exclude Color Matching Requirements from Policies

The summer of 2017 saw a number of severe storms in the Midwest, with resulting insurance claims. As policyholders have made those claims, some have been surprised to see new provisions in their insurance contracts.  Things are not always black and white in insurance policies, especially when it comes to the impact of a Minnesota court decision that required insurers providing replacement cost coverage to reasonably match replacement siding. Since the Minnesota Supreme Court issued its opinion in Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium Association, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, insurers have begun inserting language in their policies that expressly precludes the coverage requirement of matching based upon color, a change in product specifications, or other factors, in an attempt to circumvent this clear precedent.     Read the article…………..

Editor

Recent Posts

Essential Guide to Understanding Your HOA Board of Directors

HOAs play a crucial role in maintaining residential communities, ensuring they operate smoothly and preserve…

15 hours ago

Californians are Protecting Themselves from Wildfire. Why is there still an Insurance Crisis?

Fire officials, lawmakers, insurance agents and others are asking homeowners to help lower the risk…

15 hours ago

No peace symbol! Eagle Crest HOA cracks down on unauthorized flags (OR)

No peace symbols. That’s the message one man in Eagle Crest got from his homeowner’s…

1 day ago

Delray Beach HOA Goes To Real Court Over Sport Court (FL)

The Delray Beach gated community of Casabella is suing a Palm Beach County sport court…

1 day ago

Divided Gilbert community ousts HOA board (AZ)

About 12 years after he moved into the newly built Greenfield Lakes community in Gilbert,…

1 day ago