MI Ct. of App. Rules That HOA Developer is Subject to the Michigan Consumer Protection Act

In Liss v. Lewiston–Richard Inc, 478 Mich. 203; 732 NW2d 514 (2007), the Michigan Supreme Court held that a residential home builder was exempt from compliance with the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, MCL 445.901 et seq. The Michigan Supreme Court reasoned that MCL 445.904(1)(a) exempted homebuilders from compliance with the Act as they were specifically authorized to build homes under the Michigan Occupational Code, MCL 339.101 et seq.    Read the article…………

Editor

Recent Posts

Condo community installs gates at trash enclosures (NV)

Q: I live in a small condominium community of 84 units. We have three trash…

3 hours ago

Not Crazy: Insurance Premiums

Before we look at the data, I can speak about my local experience in Southwest…

6 hours ago

Residents of a Kaua?i condo are unsure about relocation plans following DHHL purchase (HI)

Condominium residents of the Courtyards at Waipouli Apartments on Kaua?i are concerned that they will…

6 hours ago

HOA Homefront: Did they change our rules properly? (CA)

Kelly,  If the board decides to change any rules shouldn’t those rule changes be placed…

6 hours ago

HOA Q&A: Can we give notice about a Board meeting electronically? (FL)

Q: What are the requirements regarding electronic Board meeting notices as governed by "Florida Administrative…

6 hours ago

Regency Gardens Homeowners look to oust condo board that demanded $22k for special assessment fee (FL)

Residents in one Orlando condominium complex are fighting back after their condo association board asked…

19 hours ago