The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp., Read the article……………
HOA nightmares are one of the most frequent calls into the Channel 2 Action News…
Homeowners in the Eucalyptus Hill Improvement Association (EHIA) have brought in a herd of goats…
As Floridians, the dance of hurricane prep is an annual occurrence. From June to November,…
Embarking on a major refurbishment project for a condominium is an exciting endeavor, promising revitalized…
In the realm of condominium maintenance and improvement, decisions regarding windows and exterior aesthetics are…
If the association is still doing things the old fashioned way and making deposits by…