Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………

Editor

Recent Posts

Hurricane Preparedness: Beyond the Basics (FL)

As Floridians, the dance of hurricane prep is an annual occurrence. From June to November,…

13 hours ago

Uncovering Asbestos During Condo Refurbishment: Navigating Challenges and Options (ON)

Embarking on a major refurbishment project for a condominium is an exciting endeavor, promising revitalized…

17 hours ago

Enhancing Condo Aesthetics: Window Replacement vs. Repainting Considerations (ON)

In the realm of condominium maintenance and improvement, decisions regarding windows and exterior aesthetics are…

17 hours ago

Big Changes to Condo Record Laws (FL)

If the association is still doing things the old fashioned way and making deposits by…

20 hours ago