In the case of YCC 435 v. Karnis et al, the parties agreed that the resident required a service animal because of the resident’s disability. However, the condominium corporation claimed that the resident’s need for accommodation did not entitle the resident to the particular dog, which exceeded the weight limit, and was a prohibited breed, under the corporation’s rules. Read the article………………………..
Related Post
February 17, 2016
February 22, 2017
October 10, 2017
April 7, 2017
Comments are closed.