Plaintiff, an owner of a condominium unit, filed a complaint, individually and derivatively on behalf of the condominium association (Association), against the Association and four members of its board of directors (Board), claiming that Defendants had refused effectively to enforce the condominium’s smoking ban. The business and consumer docket dismissed the counts of the complaint related to the smoking ban for failure to state a claim. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the court did not err in (1) finding that Plaintiff did not have a right to bring a shareholder derivative action under either the Maine Condominium Act or the Maine Nonprofit Corporation Act; (2) dismissing Plaintiff’s individual claims related to the smoking ban; and (3) denying Plaintiff’s motion to file a second amended complaint following the partial dismissal of his amended complaint.
Owners at the Regency Gardens Condominiums got notices saying their board plans to pass a…
The aftermath from the multi-day barricade in Henderson remains. The face of the townhome where…
The Arizona Court of Appeals on Tuesday rejected a lawsuit filed by debt collectors and…
Buckley says the condo association was developed with private infrastructure and the maintenance of roadways…
The Netstrata insurance scandal rocked the strata management industry in NSW but that’s just the…
"We started the energy modernization of the house back in 19. At that time, we…