In Michigan, many condominium documents contain a limitation that a Unit may be used for “residential purposes” only. Historically, an owner or the developer of a parcel of property could impose reasonable building, use, and occupancy restrictions on a parcel of property subject to public policy limitations. Kaczynski v. Lindahl, 5 Mich App 377; 146 NW2d 675 (1996). Lately, the term “residential purpose” or “residential use” has taken on new meaning with the growth of home offices, short-term rentals, internet re-sale home businesses or otherwise conducting limited business activities in the Unit such as tutoring, babysitting, Craigslist sales, piano lessons, Tupperware sales, Rodan and Fields, etc. Read the article……………………..
The B.C. Ministry of Housing recently announced new regulations to close a loophole that allowed…
In a significant decision for New York condo boards and property managers, the Supreme Court…
McLean has been working on the project for three years but says he has encountered…
A group of neighbors at Buckley Towers condominiums in northeast Miami-Dade claimed in court that…
Residents in a quiet Cadence community in Henderson want answers after a 37-hour-long barricade situation…
For board members of homeowners and condo associations in Florida, addressing disaster preparedness and safety/security…