In the case of OCCC 574 v. OCCC 573, there was a retaining wall located (essentially between the two condominiums) partially on each property. About 60% of the retaining wall was on the OCCC 574 property, and about 40% of the retaining wall was on the OCCC 573 property. The retaining wall was nearing the end of its life, and needed to be rebuilt. There was no registered agreement addressing responsibility for the retaining wall. The two corporations could not agree on the sharing, and this dispute ultimately ended up in Court. Our firm acted for OCCC 574, which was entirely successful on the Application. Read the article…………………………….
(a) Notwithstanding any other law or the association’s governing documents, a board meeting or meeting…
The ultimate test of a binding settlement agreement is whether the parties to the agreement…
All too often attorneys only tell others about the cases they win. This column is…
The High Court of Sabah and Sarawak here on Tuesday settled a lawsuit claim over…
Enumerate, the leading provider of community association management software and payments solutions, is excited to…
It meant that, continuing Thursday and on into this week, contested issues regarding the north…