When the Florida Supreme Court wrote the Tiara Condominium opinion the legal community was unsure what the opinion meant. Tiara Condominium Association, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc,., 110 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2013). The opinion clearly states that the economic loss doctrine is applicable only in the context of products liability cases. However, did Tiara Condominium also eliminate the contractual privity economic loss rule, which was sometimes referred to as the independent tort doctrine? There still is not absolute clarity on this topic but the reasoned decision is that the independent tort doctrine preceded the economic loss rule and is not abolished by Tiara Condominium. Read the article……….
After their media investigation @LintonBesser and @NinahKopel from @ABCNews published an article High-profile strata company…
Flooding at a condominium car park along Balmoral Crescent was not caused by rainfall but…
New legislation signed into law this week sets clearer, stricter deadlines for filing loss assessment…
According to Redfin, the median time a Florida home spent on the market was 57…
Residents of affordable developments such as Park City Heights and Central Park Condos told the…
Community members packed the Wantagh American Legion hall for the meeting, which was hosted by…