In Sanzaro v Ardiente Homeowners Association, et. al., Docket No. 2:11-CV0-1143-RFB-CWH, 2019 WL 1049380 (D Nev, March 5, 2019), a federal court imposed a judgment of $350,000 in compensatory damages, $285,000 in punitive damages and awarded the plaintiffs attorney’s fees and costs against their homeowners association. Based upon the facts of the case, the court determined that the homeowners association violated the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq., by denying the plaintiffs the ability to bring a service animal into the clubhouse on three different occasions and subsequently harassing them after denying their request for a reasonable accommodation Read the article……………………..
This is the second in a five-part series on HOA need-to-know items. 1. HOA living…
Acivil society group, the Civil Society Alliance for Transparency and Development (CSATD), is urging authorities…
Skyrocketing insurance costs are hitting Hawaii owners hard, especially those with condominiums. The rising costs…
Q. I am wondering what would need to be done to change the bylaws of…
Living in a neighborhood with a homeowner’s association comes with some perks but also some…
Shelly Law read over all the disclosure forms and saw no red flags when she…