This Interest May Be Common, But It’s Still Privileged Re: California Evidence Rules

In an opinion issued yesterday, the California Court of Appeal ruled that litigation meetings held by a homeowner’s association counsel with individual homeowners did not result in a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. Seahaus La Jolla Owners Ass’n v. Superior Court, Cal. Ct. Appeal Case No. D064567 (March 12, 2014).     Read more………


Related Articles

Grove Isle Condo Association’s (FL) Suit Wrongfully Dismissed

A state appellate court on Wednesday revived a lawsuit by a condominium association in Miami’s Coconut Grove against a hotel

Be Careful What You Wish For: Arbitration Is Not Mediation (NJ)

A recent decision by the Appellate Division of New Jersey’s Superior Court demonstrates the need for precision in defining what

Florida Appellate Court Rules “Safe Harbor” Liability Does Not Include Interest, Late Fees, Costs, Attorney Fees Or Other Charges

a homeowner association appealed a trial court ruling in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) holding the estoppel letters issued by the homeowner association did not comply with Fla. Stat. §720.3085’s “safe harbor” protections