MI Ct. of App. Rules That HOA Developer is Subject to the Michigan Consumer Protection Act

In Liss v. Lewiston–Richard Inc, 478 Mich. 203; 732 NW2d 514 (2007), the Michigan Supreme Court held that a residential home builder was exempt from compliance with the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, MCL 445.901 et seq. The Michigan Supreme Court reasoned that MCL 445.904(1)(a) exempted homebuilders from compliance with the Act as they were specifically authorized to build homes under the Michigan Occupational Code, MCL 339.101 et seq.    Read the article…………


Related Articles

Lender liability for Florida HOA and condominium association assessments 2014 update

While Florida continues to make progress processing and completing the backlog of residential foreclosures stemming from the prior decade’s housing

Do HOA Managers Often Practice Without a License?

This question was posed to the Florida Bar’s Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law, who held a hearing

Can First Deeds of Trust Survive an HOA Foreclosure in Wake of the SFR Investments Decision (NV)?

In September 2014, the Nevada Supreme Court, in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 334 P.3d 408