Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………


Related Articles

FHA Condo Rules are Outdated and Burdensome, Say 69 Members of Congress

In a letter sent last week to Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, 69 members of Congress

CO: State HOA bill defanged, sent to study

A bill that would empower the state to investigate homeowners association infractions and enforce HOA laws will be significantly watered

Does Your Homeowners Association Have the Right to Sue on Your Behalf? (MO)

Homeowners associations regularly file lawsuits to protect the interests of their members. These actions are oftentimes met with a challenge