Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………


Related Articles

New High-rise Fire Safety Law Goes Into Effect Jan. 1 (IL)

A new law is set to go into effect impacting hundreds of high-rise residences in Chicago, and many of those

(CO) Emergency Rule-Making Hearing Scheduled for Manager Licensure

The Colorado Division of Real Estate is gearing up to get the rulemaking process rolling on the new manager licensure

Two New Laws Affect Washington Community Associations

Almost every session of the Washington Legislature produces new laws pertaining to Washington condominium and homeowners associations.  This legislative session