Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………


Related Articles

Seaview Ass’n of Fire Island, N.Y., Inc. v. Williams case brief

CASE SYNOPSIS Defendant property owners sought review of the judgment from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the

Manufacturers May Be Exempt From Liability Under the Condominium Act

In a recent decision, the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida strictly construed the terminology of the Condominium Act

North Carolina Case Law Update: Community Covenants’ Impact on Club Operations

This decision illustrates the importance of reviewing and considering the impact of restrictive covenants on operations of a club or