Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………


Related Articles

Washington Court of Appeals Enforces HOA’s Dues Increase Approval Requirement

The Washington Court of Appeals issued a published opinion earlier this year that enforced an approval requirement for dues increases

Residential Storage Condominium Unit Bill Introduced (CO)

Yesterday, House Bill 14-1143 (“HB 1143”) was introduced to address how storage condominium units are taxed. According to the legislation,

Maryland General Assembly Passes Bill That Will Limit Condo and Homeowner Association Liability For “Errors and Omissions” In Resale Certificates

A bill that was originally intended to limit fees charged by condominium associations for providing resale certificates has passed both