Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………


Related Articles

Unintended Consequences (WA)

However, the Bilanko Court did not really define what it means for an association to “exceed its legal authority.”

AL: Homeowners’ associations face scrutiny

A state task force is looking into homeowners’ associations and whether they’re too restrictive. One Montgomery resident says he knows

Immediate Changes Come to Condo Financing Thanks to FHA

Effective immediately, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development has loosened the rules regarding condominium financing under the the