Oregon Supreme Court bars plaintiff from executing on covenant judgment against the defendant’s insurer

The Oregon Supreme Court recently answered a question certified to it by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asked whether a settlement agreement that released an insured from liability could be amended to revive the liability of the insured so that the plaintiff could seek recovery from the insurer. The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that, based upon the theory presented by the plaintiff, the settlement agreement could not be amended. A&T Siding v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.,     Read the article……………


Related Articles

Corbin Park developer lawsuit ends, but not the fight about fees

A lawsuit filed against Corbin Park developer Mike Schlup recently settled out of court for $11 million. Tenants who bought

Hold On A Minute! About Those New Overtime Rules…

On Tuesday, November 22, a federal court judge in Texas issued an injunction blocking implementation of the Obama administration’s new

BCCA (Canada) Overturns Decision Allowing Post-Closing Rescission Of Pre-Sale Condo Contracts

On March 4, 2014, the B.C. Court of Appeal released its judgment in Woo v. Onni 2014 BCCA 76, reversing