In the case of YCC 435 v. Karnis et al, the parties agreed that the resident required a service animal because of the resident’s disability. However, the condominium corporation claimed that the resident’s need for accommodation did not entitle the resident to the particular dog, which exceeded the weight limit, and was a prohibited breed, under the corporation’s rules. Read the article………………………..
Related Post
August 4, 2018
September 15, 2021
September 9, 2022
Comments are closed.