In the case of YCC 288 v. Tamhane, the condominium corporation had “no pets” provisions in the Declaration and Rules. The corporation had nevertheless permitted a dog as a service animal (i.e. an accommodation of a human rights need). Read the article………………………..
Related Post
April 22, 2021
June 21, 2017
September 22, 2014
July 20, 2021
Comments are closed.