On August 16, 2012, our state supreme court issued its opinion in Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development, Case No. S186149 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Aug.16, 2012). The high court found that CC&Rs mandating arbitration between developers and homeowner associations (HOAs) were enforceable under the Davis-Stirling Act and were not unconscionable in nature. There are at least two possible implications arising from Pinnacle that have importance in the attorney’s fees area. Read More……
Related Post
September 30, 2023
December 23, 2018
February 13, 2014
Comments are closed.